General Robert E. Lee An Gettysburg Essay Sample free essay sample

Introduction The armed forces appointed me to supply psychological services to the Confederate military personnels stationed in Virginia during the civil war. I served under Gen. R. Lee in the twelvemonth 1863. I was privileged to work with a adult male who performed good under force per unit area and for who desperation featured non in his vocabulary. I have detailed seven cardinal constructs that guided us on military psychological science particularly in the tally up and the terminal of the Battle of Gettysburg. Choice and Classification of War Fighters As the war progressed the committedness of soldiers towards the war attempt in the Confederate ground forces of the province of Virginia began to come into inquiry. Some fought with their scruples over the fact that they had to travel to war against their brothers and sisters over what was fundamentally a political affair. There was the other group that welcomed a conflict against the brotherhood forces seeing it as an chance to asseverate themselves and derive existent independency. The loss of military personnels on their side. encouraged about 75 % of the military personnels. To them it was a worthy forfeit for worthy cause. To guarantee that the best combatants were placed in the most strategic countries it was necessary to carry on a distinct ‘commitment audit’ of all go outing soldiers and new recruits. They were classified into category A. B and C. Class a consisted of those who were diehard protagonists of the Confederate purposes. They besides had some old military experience. Class B was made up of those work forces whose committedness was tempered by the household duties but whose resoluteness was however really strong. Third. category C was made of inexperient work forces who s determination to fall in the ground forces was non really clear. Most likely equal force per unit area and the menace of reprisals from those who had joined played a portion in their enlisting. As a general regulation. category C were given the humble responsibilities. category B formed the frontline and category A the vanguard. At the Battle of Gettysburg. the immense losingss forced a reconsideration of placement and a batch of those in category C were thrown into the frontline. It was merely towards the terminal of the war that the Confederate ground forces attempted to enroll black slaves to assist in the war attempt. But it was excessively small excessively tardily. Leadership Style General Lee was an exceeding leader. Initially he was against the sequence of Virginia from the Union. But when he changed his head and joined the Confederate forces he gave himself 100 % to the war attempt. He had a really high ego regard and assurance in his abilities which shone through in conflicts like that of Seven Days Battle and the Second Battle of Bull Run. He had compassion for his military personnels and neer lacked words of encouragement. He was a adult male of humbleness who accepted errors when he made them. After the loss at Picket’s charge he met his military personnels stating. ’†¦this is my full mistake. ’ ( Davis. William C. . et Al. 1997 ) He was leader who can be said to take from the forepart. Not diffident of licking. he risked a batch at the Battle of Gettysburg in the hope of triumph. He was besides a rational adult male. At the terminal of the war he discouraged dissatisfied elements from engaging a guerrilla war. He gained nationw ide celebrity for his gallant attempts in both the brotherhood and Confederate ground forcess in which he both served. Team Performance General Lee scored extremely in the country of squad public presentation. The resonance between him and his equals was exceeding and this led to the early triumphs against the Union forces. His ability to animate his military personnels in the wake of military contraries was a conducive factor to the integrity of intent that prevailed throughout the war. In determination devising he may non hold involved his fellow commanding officers every bit much as he should hold. Human Performance. Under Adverse Conditionss Unlike many people General Lee was able to pull on his quenchless militias of self-control to force frontward in the undertaking of prosecuting the war attempt. It was unbelievable that after the serious losingss at Gettysburg that he could go on to execute without confronting a mental dislocation. He was able to set into pattern the doctrine of populating one twenty-four hours at a clip. Consequently he did non let the contraries of old conflicts to stifle his contending spirit instead he drew upon the successes and inspired those around that things could merely acquire better. When licking was certain he had the lucidity of head to accept the world instead than populate in denial. Stress in the Military Setting His initial reluctance to back up the sequence moves by the Confederates and his undying trueness to his place province. must hold placed him under a batch of emphasis. But one time he resigned from the brotherhood army his head was settled and the quandary resolved. ( Davis. William C. et Al. 1997 ) This gave him the peace of head to prosecute his end with a straightforwardness of intent. The early triumphs helped to disperse any uncertainties or concerns of his determination to fall in the war. The reversals. he handled with the sobriety of wisdom that dictated the worlds of war. The concluding confrontation and his attitude towards the result show a adult male good in control of his mental modules. In a nutshell this was a adult male who handled emphasis like a chef would manage a cutting knife. careful it could cut but utile all the same. His offer to vacate after the conflict of Gettysburg shows he had the humbleness to accept the effects of his actions Information Warfare The deployment of undercover agents helped the General in the Battle of Antietam. By acquiring to cognize of the programs of the Union ground forces. he was able to redeploy his military personnels to support their places. The conflict was bloody but the Union forces were pushed back. He was out on his defensive by an article in the ‘Tribune’ that he pitilessly whipped his slaves that had attempted to get away. This included a female slave. He decided non to counter these claims preferring to disregard them despite the harm it did to his character. ( Blassingame. John W ( ed. ) 1977 ) Diversity and Gender Issues The general did non believe the black slave community could assist in the war attempt. The war was really being fought for the emancipation of slaves. Thus it was merely in the face of certain licking that he offered them a opportunity to contend for his side in exchange for emancipation. He found converting other people of this thought hard. His ground forces was forced to turn to inexperienced work forces and untrained soldiers and this must hold had a net consequence on the public presentation of his ground forcess. That there were no mass desertions shows that he could do work forces out of male childs within no clip. Womans were non straight deployed in the warfront as the policy had non yet come of age. Decision The licking of the Confederate ground forces was bound to go on. The ground forces was non every bit good prepared for the war as was the Union ground forces. The trust on any available able bodied adult male instead than trained soldiers meant that there were outnumbered and out performed from the start. The foolhardy deployment of military personnels instead than tactical onslaughts would hold saved him many military personnels. He seems to hold made all the decisive determinations without the input of his other commanding officers. The Battle of Gettysburg may hold turned out otherwise if he had sought the advice of other people. ( Connelly. Thomas L. . 1969 ) Mentions Blassingame. John W ( ed. ) ( 1977 ) .Slave Testimony: Two Centuries of Letters. Speeches. and Interviews. and Autobiographies. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press ( ISBN 0-8071-0273-3 ) . Connelly. Thomas L. . ( 1969 ) : â€Å"Robert E. Lee and the Western Confederacy: A Criticism of Lee’s Strategic Ability. † Civil War History 15 116-32 Davis. William C. . Pohanka. Brian C. . Troiani. Don. explosive detection systems. . ( 1997 )Civil War Journal. The Leaderships. Rutledge Hill Press. . ISBN 0-517-22193-4.